Sources from Stephen Crothers:
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0569

Science has become a ritualistic numerological slight of hand with objectivity being leftover long behind.

Stephen Hawking is one of the most celebrated pastors of Church of scientism who published two of biggest selling sci-fi fantasy books namely – A brief History of Time and The Universe In a Nutshell. Both have zero grounds with objective science with pure mathematical fantasies. Hawking is famous for his peddling of Big Bang creationism myth without any rational reasoning. But he is less famous for his another mathematical sleight of hand cammed Hawking Radiation. Scientists have bee seeking empirical evidence for it since years and found none.

How can you font empirical evidence of something which has no objective basis?

It’s a violation of thermodynamics.

Following equation of temperature of black holes which is carved in his tombstone.

\begin{equation}\begin{aligned} T = \frac{ħ c^{3}}{8πGMk}\end{aligned}\end{equation}

Anybody with knowledge of basic physics will say that this equation is utter nonsense. as it is violation of laws of thermodynamics and temperature is an INTENSIVE PROPERTY, which doesn’t depend on mass of matter.

In the equation,

T is temperature,
ħ the reduced Planck’s constant,
c is the speed of light in free space,
G the constant of gravitation,
M the black hole mass, and
k is Boltzmann’s constant.

Now ħ, G and k are universal constants so they have no thermodynamic character.

The numbers 8 and π are pure numbers so they too have no thermodynamic character.

Temperature T and mass M have thermodynamic character. Temperature is always intensive, according to the 0th and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Mass is not intensive, mass is extensive.

In any thermodynamic equation the units must be the same on both sides (dimensional analysis) and the thermodynamic character must also balance.

If one side of an equation is extensive (or intensive), then so must be the other side.

The concept of intensive and extensive properties is so important that Peter Landsberg wanted to establish it as The 4ᵗʰ Law of Thermodynamics.

Hawking’s equation equates temperature, which is always intensive, to a combination of terms which is not intensive. His equation is therefore in violation of the laws of thermodynamics. So it’s false.

Jacob Bekenstein and Stephen Hawking advanced an equation for black hole entropy.

Here is their equation:

\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}S = \frac{πAkc^{3}}{2hG}\end{aligned}\end{equation}

S is entropy,
A is the area of the alleged black hole event horizon,
c is the speed of light in free space,
h is Planck’s constant, and
G the constant of gravitation.

To clarify this equation, the area A = 4πR² where R is the so-called Schwarzschild radius:

\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}R = \frac{2GM}{c^{2}}\end{aligned}\end{equation}

So the area of the black hole event horizon is:

\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}A = \frac{16πG^{2}M^{2}}{c^{4}}\end{aligned}\end{equation}

Putting this into the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy equation gives,

\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}S = \frac{8π^{2}kGM^{2}}{hc}\end{aligned}\end{equation}

Once again all the terms other than M are either universal constants or pure numbers and so have no thermodynamic character. Entropy has the thermodynamic character of being extensive. Now mass is extensive, but mass squared is not extensive. Thus, the Bekenstein-Hawking black hole entropy equation equates entropy, which is extensive, to a combination of terms that is not extensive, thereby violating the laws of thermodynamics. The Bekenstein-Hawking black hole entropy equation is therefore invalid.

The photons emitted by a blackhole are said to manifest a blackbody spectrum. This is IMPOSSIBLE. It takes a physical lattice to produce such a spectrum, not simply thermal equilibrium with an enclosure.

Just because an expression is dimensionally correct doesn’t make it physically valid. Mathematics is NOT Physics.

Physicists have disconnected themselves from physical reality and switched to pure mathematical fantasies. Physics without physicality is metaphysics. That’s why there is no scientific progression in physics till 100 years. Technological progression is not scientific progression.

This nonsense needs to stop.